Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Comparative Political Studies
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reuveny, R.
Right arrow Articles by Li, Q.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Economic Openness, Democracy, and Income Inequality

An Empirical Analysis

Rafael Reuveny

Indiana University

Quan Li

Pennsylvania State University

Scholars have studied effects of economic openness and democracy on national income inequality in two literatures. In democracy studies, scholars agree democracy reduces inequality but empirical evidence is ambiguous. In globalization studies, effects of economic openness on inequality are debated but have not been rigorously examined. This article is the first systematic statistical study of the effects of both economic openness and democracy on income inequality. These effects need to be studied together. The authors measure national income inequality from a comprehensive Gini coefficient data set. Economic openness is measured from trade flows, foreign direct investment inflows, and financial capital inflows. The period studied is 1960 to 1996, the unit of analysis is a country decade, and the sample includes 69 countries. The authors find that democracy and trade reduce income inequality, foreign direct investments increase income inequality, and financial capital does not affect income inequality. Policy implications are discussed.

Key Words: globalization • national Gini • statistical analysis • policy

Comparative Political Studies, Vol. 36, No. 5, 575-601 (2003)
DOI: 10.1177/0010414003036005004


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
Quan Li
Democracy, Autocracy, and Expropriation of Foreign Direct Investment
Comparative Political Studies, August 1, 2009; 42(8): 1098 - 1127.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of SociologyHome page
S. J. Babones and D. C. Vonada
Trade globalization and national income inequality -- are they related?
Journal of Sociology, March 1, 2009; 45(1): 5 - 30.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Developing SocietiesHome page
S. Adams and B. Mengistu
Privatization, Governance and Economic Development in Developing Countries
Journal of Developing Societies, October 1, 2008; 24(4): 415 - 438.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Comparative Political StudiesHome page
Aili Mari Tripp and A. Kang
The Global Impact of Quotas: On the Fast Track to Increased Female Legislative Representation
Comparative Political Studies, March 1, 2008; 41(3): 338 - 361.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Peace ResearchHome page
Q. Li and M. Wen
The Immediate and Lingering Effects of Armed Conflict on Adult Mortality: A Time-Series Cross-National Analysis
Journal of Peace Research, July 1, 2005; 42(4): 471 - 492.
[Abstract] [PDF]